Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Gallery Index & Tech Ref
Goldwing Trivia
Goldwing- The First 20 Years
From Japan to USA
Goldwing Magazine Articles
Two Wheel Magazine 1975- Honda's GL1000, The Future
Cycle Illustrated, Nov. 1975- 2 Big Ones From Honda
1977 Model GL1000 Setup Instructions
Owners Manuals
GL1000
1975 GL1000
1978 GL1000
GL1100
1980 GL1100 Standard
1981 GL1100 Interstate
1982 GL1100 Aspencade
1982 GL1100 Interstate
1982 GL1100 Standard
1983 GL1100 Aspencade
1983 GL1100 Interstate
GL1200
1984 GL1200 Standard
1986 GL1200 Interstate
1987 GL1200 Aspencade
GL1500
1987 GL1200 Aspencade
Service Bulletins and Recalls- All Models
GL1000
GL1000- Important GL1000 Service Reminder (1 Page) 6-13-1975
SL #108 Tire and Wheel Rim Matching Information 6-20-75 (7 pages)
Service Tools Newsletter 7-31-75 (2 pages)
SB 1000 #3 Pressurised Cooling System Tester 10-10-75 (3 pages)
SB 1000 #1 Cylinder Head Core Plug Leakage- Revised 7-9-76 (3 pages)
SL #117 Exhaust Pipe and Muffler Paint Damage 9-30-76 (1 page)
SL #118 Instrument Troubleshooting 10-27-76 (5 pages)
PB 1000-2 Changes to Clutch Components 11-3-76 (1 page)
PB 1000-3 Changes to Right Front Engine Cover 1-5-77 (1 page)
SB 1000 #11 Final Drive Gear Case Cover Change 10-15-77 (1 page)
SB 1000 #12 New Main Bearing Caps 11-23-77 (1 page)
SB 1000 #13 Recall to Replace Rear Brake Pads 3-21-78 (5 pages)
SB 1000 #14 Cylinder Head Bolt Torque Change 11-8-78 (1 page)
GL1200
Special Consumer Report: 1984 and 1985 GW Rear Hub
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Classic Goldwing Technical Forums
Lighting & Electrical
C5, PowerArc, and the mystery of Timing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Classic Goldwings:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AApple" data-source="post: 95887" data-attributes="member: 56"><p>As long as the throttle blades are OPEN, there will be no, or <strong>very</strong> little vacuum in an engine. Take a sneezle engine, fer instance....they don't create ANY vacuum, because they don't(normally) have a throttle blade, or any control over air intake. That's why they need a vacuum pump.</p><p>There has to be some sort of restriction in the intake tract to "create" vacuum....that restriction is the throttle blade(s). A carbed engine needs some sort of vacuum to "pull/suck" the fuel out of the fuel bowl. Fuel injected gas engines use a vacuum signal to determine engine load, among other things.</p><p>Vac 101...class dismissed.... :smilie_happy: </p><p></p><p>Now back to your regularly scheduled timing thread....</p><p>Looking at the charts posted, I see very little difference in the 4 plotted curves, and <strong>mostly</strong> the difference is above 3500 rpm...right about where the vac and mechanical advance would start pulling the timing back up(advancing). At least one of the charts shows a larger difference in the low rpms, but not much in the higher rpms.</p><p>So....I'm starting to unnerstand(it's a MIRACLE!) the programing on the Power Arc/C5.... I may be slow, but...I'll get there! :hihihi:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AApple, post: 95887, member: 56"] As long as the throttle blades are OPEN, there will be no, or [b]very[/b] little vacuum in an engine. Take a sneezle engine, fer instance....they don't create ANY vacuum, because they don't(normally) have a throttle blade, or any control over air intake. That's why they need a vacuum pump. There has to be some sort of restriction in the intake tract to "create" vacuum....that restriction is the throttle blade(s). A carbed engine needs some sort of vacuum to "pull/suck" the fuel out of the fuel bowl. Fuel injected gas engines use a vacuum signal to determine engine load, among other things. Vac 101...class dismissed.... :smilie_happy: Now back to your regularly scheduled timing thread.... Looking at the charts posted, I see very little difference in the 4 plotted curves, and [b]mostly[/b] the difference is above 3500 rpm...right about where the vac and mechanical advance would start pulling the timing back up(advancing). At least one of the charts shows a larger difference in the low rpms, but not much in the higher rpms. So....I'm starting to unnerstand(it's a MIRACLE!) the programing on the Power Arc/C5.... I may be slow, but...I'll get there! :hihihi: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Classic Goldwing Technical Forums
Lighting & Electrical
C5, PowerArc, and the mystery of Timing
Top