joke of the day and every day it seems

[Omega Man]

dan filipi » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:45 pm[/url]":1qbs53gt]
Because CM has claimed originality by using "chokes" AFTER Joe said it's what he uses, I have purposefully posted in my riser/adapter thread claiming originality of the mod to CGW for CM to read so they don't rip that off too.
Yeah, put that in your "band aid fix" and smoke it!

Could you link that thread here Dan I can't find it?

~O~

 

[slabghost]

Check the link in the first post. You may have to go back a few pages.

 

[dan filipi]

Omega Man » Sun Jan 26, 2014 7:59 pm[/url]":h8fia9x8]

dan filipi » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:45 pm[/url]":h8fia9x8]
Because CM has claimed originality by using "chokes" AFTER Joe said it's what he uses, I have purposefully posted in my riser/adapter thread claiming originality of the mod to CGW for CM to read so they don't rip that off too.
Yeah, put that in your "band aid fix" and smoke it!

Could you link that thread here Dan I can't find it?

~O~

viewtopic.php?p=108374#p108374

 

[joedrum]

cm85 reminds me of Nascar racing ... cavemen rednecks taught Detroit and the world how to setup motors and race big time and created a huge sport with the family car ... it took 50 yrs to root out the rednecks and take over nascar ... and they never did it by winning one race ... they did it by outlawing every freedom and ability that had made nascar a great sport ...and then called it a tech revolution that did it ...simply a big fat lie 100% ...you simply cant outlaw someone and call that beating them but that's what they did plain simple ... same is still true today ... give moreece petty or the woods brothers ernie elliott there finest tech head car and these guys will make it better period .. people like this are being rooted out and newcomers too and have ruin the sport completely....

cm85 is just like nascar corporate takeover of a sport where they never actually won a race fair ... they got rid of the competition through the back door and raced themselves only ....cm85 trying to do the same thing it seems in this single carb deal ... this guy has held back progress in single like no other....and the best friend a part supplier for stock carbs ever had ....nascar is hopelessly lost ... but oldwings and getting them to run in todays world is not ... but you have to watch out for these type of people that think the masses are to stupid and the rules should be made to stop them from freely doing what they want to there bike and sharing that with others ... without one of these techniods bashing the hell out of them ... sheesh

 

[slabghost]

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdbro View Post
part of what i understood from Dan was 2 plugs, or one end was running richer, centering the charge seemed to have some effect on that, according to reports,
Adding plenum volume attempts to compensate for unequal runner tract lengths by slowing the charge down. Raising the carburetors throttle blade from the plenum floor, in conjunction with a now slower charge from the added volume, allows more time for the atomized fuel to make the turn to the runner after exiting the venturi and through the throttle blade. Speed of the charge is unaffected since runner length hasn't canged and internal volume of runners is unchanged. The charge is first condensed a bit ay the base of the adapter and the distance is altered some to allow the fuel charge to arrive at the valves at a more opportune time.

It is my view that he sees results with his conversion, yes. But he does not know why he is seeing them and must formulate some reasoning before conveying it. Your reasoning won't hold water.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdbro View Post
i wondered about tha cos i don't recall westgl having that issue, actually i don't recall wgl having any issues not using the 2 to 1 adapter
...nor do I have the issue. Of course not westgl is so nusy revising he hasn't refined a version yet.
Quality construction practices are important.

I equalize distribution by port tuning my individual fuel tracts.
Equalized distribution via increased plenum volume and "centering" the input charge into a intake manifolds plenum chamber is smoke and mirrors as the actual problem still exists. He will find this out once he actually gets time on the bike in.
You will if you ever ride yours.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdbro View Post
but then hott as well as joedrum seemed to agree to some clear benefits using the adapter, though i think some of it had to do with when/if using larger carbs
I suppose they will speak on it for themselves. I don't see them contributing to this thread.
Hott's manifold needed something to mount a two-barrel carburetor to what is normally considerd a single-barrel manifold. I suppose he found it in the adaptor.
Joe doesn't have a stock engine and admits to knowing very little of one as it relates to this particular conversion. Whatever he is doing to his bike pertains to Joes interpretation of his results just as Dans pertains to his. Others may see my view differently.
Finally some truth!
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdbro View Post
not clear on this part?
Oh, just a new thread boasting of Tom's carburetor over there. It's good to see people having a easier time in getting a conversion completed in short order, even of ot takes two Forums to make it happen.

I'm happy that others are finally seeing the benefits in heating their conversion manifold.
We've a decent NEW carburetor for a conversion now and most are seeimg the benefits of heating their manifolds as a regular process of converting. :headscratch:

Many have contributed.

While the authority here impeded every step!
What a JOKE!!! :smilie_happy:

 

[dan filipi]

Delayed throttle response hasn't happened to me by using the riser, actually improved it and it allowed me to go a step leaner in the jetting.

There is a very good reason why I claimed originality to us using this riser and first to realize it's advantages.

Cm is fishing now as he will never admit that anything good will come from our efforts here.

 

[slabghost]

And response is better because the fuel charge is arriving at a better time.

 

[AApple]

My opinions are irrelevant to this extent.

FINALLY....a truthful statement!!!! :smilie_happy: :smilie_happy: :smilie_happy:

 

[joedrum]

well Hott and im sure others had this set up in operation but for sure matching it with type4 and clarifying to all its benefits was dan and I using the piece after his purchasing it from backyard trouble paul I think ... CI manifold and transition piece .. a great conversation between the two of us and then a try on his bike as many of the single carb insight has come from since winter stop things here and we got back to it on the cali bike ... who cares if its first anyway ... what matters is that it works and we got the info out ...so people can know

so this is the complete opposite of what this fool thinks ...he thinks you have to know everything in the universe before you can do anything at all to single carb an oldwing right sheesh ... this is the recipe for stagnation like our world is in

I think maybe cm should run for president ... they all seem to be the same way LOL

 

[AApple]

Example the conversion in the pictures below.
I ran this set-up daily for over a year (with a standard air filter).
I used my original manifold designed for the DCD that was off-set to the right of centerline.
The manifold was not port tuned.
It flows extremely well without port tuning.

...my plug color was even between all cylinders.

Are you F'n KIDDIN ME?!?!?!?!?
Ain't NO WAY IN HELL....unless, of course, the thing never ran to begin with...then all the plugs would look the same, I s'pose...... :nea:

 

[Omega Man]

Yeah, that is hard to believe. :nea:

~O~

 

[joedrum]

:smilie_happy: ... why would you build it like that .. is all I can see .. wheres his technoid head at ? :headscratch:

sheesh hes a low level yard tech ..use metal tape to seal ... it works great but I am sure he didn't get that from tech U ... :hihihi:

 

[AApple]

:smilie_happy: ... wheres his technoid head at ? :headscratch:

Right here...

:hihihi:

 

[joedrum]

:smilie_happy: :smilie_happy: :smilie_happy: :smilie_happy: :smilie_happy: :smilie_happy: :smilie_happy:

 

[slabghost]

AApple » Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:19 pm[/url]":2505ndos]

:smilie_happy: ... wheres his technoid head at ? :headscratch:

Right here...

:hihihi:

:thanks: :smilie_happy: :smilie_happy: :hihihi:

 

[joedrum]

this is the crowning moment of this forums no holds conception to what it can be :whip: :smilie_happy: :yahoo: :cheeky: :mrgreen: sheesh that was great and untopable I am sure

 

[dan filipi]

Pdbro not giving in, right on!

 

[AApple]

dan filipi » Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:35 pm[/url]":1jpm1c94]
Pdbro not giving in, right on!

I saw that...he's doing his best to get Cap'n Genius to screw up and say something!! :clapping:

 

[dan filipi]

CapN Knucklehead wrote;

I've the ability to measure off-idle throttle response in milliseconds with my manifold using a variety of carburetors.

I've detailed records.

Yeah right :smilie_happy:

 

[slabghost]

Clearly, my adapter offsets the carburetor from center for mounting and, consequently, increases plenum volume at the same time.

:smilie_happy: Oh really!? Would someone please explain how the volume of a box is increased by opening one end ? :nea:
This idiot is too stupid to be allowed unsupervised contact with the outside world.